SwiftUI: An In-depth Examination for Real Projects


As an integral part of the iOS development community, I’ve experienced firsthand the transformative power of new technologies and paradigms. A substantial shift we are currently witnessing is brought by SwiftUI, Apple’s declarative UI framework. While SwiftUI promises a more efficient and integrated development experience, is it mature enough to handle real-world, complex projects? Let’s dive deeper into this discussion.

The Pros of SwiftUI: Going Beyond the Surface

SwiftUI vs. UIKit: Pros and Cons

The choice between SwiftUI and UIKit often comes down to specific project requirements. SwiftUI offers a fresh, unified, and efficient approach to UI development but may not yet be the right fit for all projects, particularly those needing extensive customization or backward compatibility. UIKit, on the other hand, is tried and tested and offers comprehensive features but lacks SwiftUI’s simplicity and modernity.

Declarative Syntax
Unlike imperative UIKit, SwiftUI’s declarative nature allows developers to focus more on “what” rather than “how.” We define the desired state of our UI, and SwiftUI renders the interface, significantly reducing the amount of boilerplate code.

Code Reusability
A key advantage of SwiftUI is its cross-platform compatibility. The same codebase can be used across iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS, ensuring consistency, reducing redundancies, and accelerating the development process. This is not only a time-saver but a strategic enabler for maintaining and scaling projects.


Live Preview and Interactive Development
SwiftUI introduces a real-time preview of the UI, a feature that significantly enhances the development process. This interactive preview capability allows developers to see changes immediately, making it an efficient tool for rapid prototyping and agile development.

State and Data Flow Management
SwiftUI’s built-in state management tools such as `@State`, `@Binding`, `@ObservedObject`, and `@EnvironmentObject` simplify the process of managing data flow. With data and state being pivotal aspects in app development, SwiftUI provides a more streamlined approach, which UIKit was often criticized for lacking.

The Cons of SwiftUI: The Challenges

Backward Compatibility and Adoption
SwiftUI’s Achilles’ heel is its lack of backward compatibility. It supports iOS 13 and later versions, which may not suffice for projects aiming for a broad user base. As a result, UIKit remains the go-to option when compatibility with older iOS versions is a concern.


Framework Maturity and Coverage
As of 2023, SwiftUI is still catching up with UIKit in terms of UI components and APIs coverage. UIKit has been around for more than a decade, making it more mature and comprehensive. Developers working on complex projects may find SwiftUI’s offering limited compared to UIKit.

Learning Curve and Paradigm Shift
SwiftUI requires not just learning new syntax but also a shift in paradigm. Transitioning from an imperative approach to a declarative one can be challenging, especially for developers deeply rooted in UIKit.

Handling Dependencies in SwiftUI

SwiftUI, like any other Swift-based project, typically uses the Swift Package Manager (SPM) to handle dependencies. SPM is seamlessly integrated into Xcode, making it easier to manage third-party libraries or frameworks. This integration allows you to add, update, or remove dependencies directly within Xcode, simplifying the process.

Architectural Considerations

Choice of architecture is crucial in determining the structure and scalability of an application. Let’s evaluate SwiftUI in the context of popular architectural patterns.


Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM)
MVVM fits seamlessly with SwiftUI due to its declarative nature. The separation of business logic from UI increases code readability, testability, and maintainability. Binding and ObservableObject concepts lend themselves well to this architecture.


The Redux architecture shines with SwiftUI’s state-driven design. It centralizes app state, enforcing unidirectional data flow, and makes state changes predictable. However, it could potentially increase the complexity of small to mid-sized apps.

Composable Architecture

Composable Architecture
Composable Architecture, a relatively new kid on the block, provides a robust and scalable solution for building applications with SwiftUI. It emphasizes composition, modularity, and testability, complementing SwiftUI’s philosophy perfectly.


Concluding Thoughts

SwiftUI has irrefutably brought a revolution in iOS app development. But whether it’s ready to take over UIKit for complex, real-world applications depends largely on specific project requirements and the targeted user base.

For teams comfortable with SwiftUI and targeting devices running iOS 13 and later, SwiftUI is an excellent choice. For those needing more comprehensive UI capabilities or compatibility with older devices, UIKit remains a reliable option.

As for architecture, it largely depends on the project’s scale, complexity, and team expertise. While MVVM and Composable Architecture seem to be a natural fit with SwiftUI, Redux may still have their place in more complex applications.

As SwiftUI continues to mature, its adoption will undoubtedly increase, making it a powerful tool for iOS app development. But for now, the choice between SwiftUI and UIKit isn’t an either/or proposition — it’s about choosing the right tool for the job.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *